|
|
|
| |
| |
Millet, production
|
FINGER Millet production
pic - 1
|
|
|
1. Finger millet production constraints
Major production constraints include; fungal diseases, pests
and labor production constraints especially weeding in Africa.
1.0 Fungal Diseases
The major disease affecting millet production is blast caused
by Pyricularia grisea, which causes lesions and premature
drying of young leaves.
Other diseases include heliminthosporium diseases, which cause
leafspots, seedling blight, and head blight in finger millet.
Control:
- Phytosanitary measures, uprooting and burning infected plants
- Use of resistant and high yielding varieties
- Spraying with copper-based fungicides
1.1 Pests
The most important pests include grasshoppers, armyworms and
ladybird. Armyworm is particularly devastating pest during early
stages of crop growth. It is capable of wiping out the entire
field necessitating re-sowing.
Birds can cause damage on finger millet when the crop is ready
for harvesting. However, in many instances damage levels are
low and do not warrant any interventions.
1.2 Labor Constraints
Finger millet production requires a lot of labor especially
for controlling weeds in broadcasted millet. In areas with declining
soil fertility and areas infested with prolific weeds, up to
4 weedings may be necessary in order to realize good yields.
Nyende et al; 2001 and Tenywa et al 1999,
have all reported and demonstrated that millet production requires
plenty of labor from poor resource farmers.
Row planting has often been advocated as a means of reducing
the labor constraint (Shaky et al, 1991) in
finger millet growing areas.
However, labor relief accruing from row planting may not be
realized in most cases since a lot of labor is required to hand
sow the seed in rows in absence of simpler mechanized alternatives.
The most labor intensive activities in millet production include
weeding and harvesting and account for approximately 25% and
14% (respectively) of the overall labor requirement (Nyende,
2000).
In conclusion, row planting has been shown to require only
46% of the total labor force required under broadcasting (Nyende,
et al, 2001). This suggests that row planting as a
practice has a potential to significantly reduce labor constraint
in finger millet production while improving millet yields and
economic returns hence achieving food security and alleviating
poverty.
References
Nyende, P. 2000. Effect of soil fertility
and weed management on the performance of finger millet in eastern
Uganda. MSc. Thesis. Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. 85pp
Nyende, P; Tenywa, J.S; Oryokot, J and Kidoido, M.
2001. Weed profiles for increased finger millet production in
eastern Uganda. African Crop Science
9: 508-515
Shakya. P.B; Upreti, R.P and Vaidya, S.1991.
Finger millet in Nepal. Importance, utilization and farming
systems in a socio-economic context. National Agricultural Research
Centre, Nepal. 156pp
Tenywa, J.S; Nyende, P; Kidoido, M; Kasenge, V; Oryokot,
J and Mbowa, S. 1999. Prospects and constraints of
finger millet production in eastern Uganda. African
Crop Science 7: 569-583
|
|
|
 |
| |